Eddie You can email them to c.d.field@bham.ac.uk Best wishes. Clive
-
Recent News
Recent Sources
- Perceptions of anti-Semitism and Islamophobia as problems in the UK (4316)
- Observance of Christmas traditions (4315)
- Plans to attend a place of worship or carol concert over Christmas (4314)
- Alternative beliefs and perceptions of proportion of Muslims in country (4313)
- Trust in clergy and priests and other professions to tell the truth (4312)
Archives
- November 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (2)
- July 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (2)
- March 2024 (2)
- February 2024 (1)
- December 2023 (2)
- November 2023 (1)
- October 2023 (1)
- September 2023 (1)
- July 2023 (1)
- June 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (1)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (1)
- December 2022 (2)
- October 2022 (1)
- September 2022 (1)
- August 2022 (2)
- July 2022 (1)
- June 2022 (1)
- May 2022 (1)
- April 2022 (1)
- February 2022 (1)
- January 2022 (3)
- December 2021 (1)
- November 2021 (1)
- October 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (1)
- July 2021 (1)
- June 2021 (1)
- May 2021 (2)
- April 2021 (1)
- March 2021 (1)
- February 2021 (1)
- January 2021 (1)
- December 2020 (1)
- November 2020 (1)
- October 2020 (1)
- August 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (1)
- June 2020 (1)
- April 2020 (1)
- March 2020 (2)
- February 2020 (1)
- January 2020 (1)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (1)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (1)
- December 2018 (4)
- August 2018 (1)
- July 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (1)
- May 2018 (2)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (1)
- January 2018 (1)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (1)
- July 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (1)
- May 2017 (2)
- April 2017 (1)
- March 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (3)
- November 2016 (1)
- October 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (1)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (5)
- April 2016 (7)
- October 2015 (3)
- September 2015 (4)
- August 2015 (3)
- July 2015 (4)
- June 2015 (4)
- May 2015 (5)
- April 2015 (4)
- March 2015 (3)
- February 2015 (3)
- January 2015 (3)
- December 2014 (6)
- November 2014 (5)
- October 2014 (9)
- September 2014 (5)
- August 2014 (4)
- July 2014 (3)
- June 2014 (7)
- May 2014 (4)
- April 2014 (7)
- March 2014 (5)
- February 2014 (3)
- January 2014 (5)
- December 2013 (3)
- November 2013 (5)
- October 2013 (5)
- September 2013 (6)
- August 2013 (3)
- July 2013 (3)
- June 2013 (6)
- May 2013 (8)
- April 2013 (5)
- March 2013 (10)
- February 2013 (7)
- January 2013 (7)
- December 2012 (13)
- November 2012 (8)
- October 2012 (5)
- September 2012 (7)
- August 2012 (3)
- July 2012 (7)
- June 2012 (9)
- May 2012 (6)
- April 2012 (12)
- March 2012 (14)
- February 2012 (15)
- January 2012 (14)
- December 2011 (20)
- November 2011 (16)
- October 2011 (13)
- September 2011 (16)
- August 2011 (9)
- July 2011 (14)
- June 2011 (19)
- May 2011 (15)
- April 2011 (18)
- March 2011 (32)
- February 2011 (16)
- January 2011 (14)
- December 2010 (24)
- November 2010 (19)
- October 2010 (23)
- September 2010 (25)
- August 2010 (18)
- July 2010 (23)
- June 2010 (19)
- May 2010 (20)
- April 2010 (30)
- March 2010 (19)
- February 2010 (20)
- January 2010 (14)
-
-
Hi. Who do we email data reports to?
Dear Deborah BRIN has not looked into this, but I am hopeful that you may be able to find this…
Hello, Do you happen to have a breakdown of the Religious affiliation of the Roma/Gypsy population in the UK? For…
Thanks for your query. There are no recent British data on these topics which spring to mind, at least so…
Recent Comments
- Clive D. Field on Counting Religion in Britain, September 2024
- eddie on Counting Religion in Britain, September 2024
- Clive D. Field on Counting Religion in Britain, February 2023
- Andrew Ducker on Counting Religion in Britain, February 2023
- Bernard Silverman on Christian decline: How it’s measured and what it means
-
8 responses to “Costing the Heavens”
-
Clive – are you going to comment on whether you consider this anaysis to have any merit. In my view it is rather like comparing the amount a school spends on sport with their maths GCSE results, then arguing that sport has no benefit as it does not improve maths results. It was described by Rev Dr Malcolm Brown, director of mission and public affairs for the Archbishops’ Council of the Church of England, as ‘a laughable misuse of statistical information’.
I wonder whether you agree.
-
Clive Field
Dear Mouse, BRIN naturally seeks to be impartial in such matters. I have deliberately kept my powder dry at the moment, pending responses to the report from faith communities, when I may well post again. All I would do at present is to make the obvious point that the methodology employed by NSS (which is probably the only one they could have used at national level) can do no more than suggest possible indirect linkages betwen chaplaincy spend and health outcomes. Direct links of cause and effect would inevitably be harder to establish, not least because chaplaincy spend constitutes such a tiny proportion of the total NHS budget and because health outcomes are affected by a wide range of clinical and other inputs. Ideally, we would need multivariate rather than bivariate analysis. But perhaps the NSS itself would wish to respond to Mouse’s challenge?
-
Clive Field
Further to my response to Church Mouse on 2 March, I have been trying to keep an eye on Christian reactions to the NSS report on hospital chaplaincy, but they seem to have been relatively muted. However, BRIN readers may like to note a letter to the editor of the CHURCH TIMES (18 March 2011, p. 13) from three members of staff of the Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation at King’s College London. They describe the NSS report as “flawed and an oversimplistic attempt to measure the ability of health-care chaplains to influence directly the overall quality of a trust’s performance and mortality ratio”. Their reasons for suggesting this are set out in some detail. Unfortunately, the letter is only available online to subscribers of the newspaper at:
http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=109385 -
Clive Field
The NSS, through Robert Stovold, issued a two-page statement on 31 March 2011 in response to the criticisms contained in the CHURCH TIMES letter which is referred to in the preceding response. The statement can be found at:
Some points in the NSS statement are also summarized in Stovold’s letter printed in the CHURCH TIMES of 8 April 2011 (p. 15). One of his main arguments is that the burden of evidential proof lies with those who claim that hospital chaplains are associated with positive health outcomes.
-
Lucy Selman
The letter written by me with colleagues at King’s College London and published in the Church Times is available here: http://www.churchtimes.co.uk/content.asp?id=109385
If you can’t access it, I am happy to send it to you (my email address is available on our webpage at King’s College London). We have written a reply to Mr Stovold’s statement, focussing on the scientific flaws in the NSS report’s metholodogy. We hope it will be published by the Church Times next week.
-
Clive Field
Further to Lucy Selman’s post of 14 April 2011, the second letter by the King’s College London team, prompted by Mr Stovold’s statement of 31 March, was published in the CHURCH TIMES of 21 April (p. 15). It argues that the outcome measures used by the NSS are inappropriate for the purpose. The letter is available online to the paper’s subscribers at:
-
Lucy Selman
Thanks for posting, Clive. The letter is open access now should anyone else be interested in reading it.
-
[…] seen from our recent coverage of the National Secular Society’s survey of hospital chaplaincy – http://www.brin.ac.uk/news/?p=905 – the links between faith and health outcomes are, indeed, a matter for vigorous […]
-