Self-assessed religiosity
In our post of 11 January 2015, we reported on the British results from the WIN/Gallup International End of Year 2014 poll, focusing on a question about trust in religious professionals, but also noting findings on two other religion-related topics, one of them self-assessed religiosity. On 13 April 2015 WIN/Gallup International and ORB International, which undertook the British fieldwork, posted online the full religiosity data and an associated religiosity index for the 64,000 respondents from 65 countries participating in the global poll. These can be downloaded from:
http://www.opinion.co.uk/article.php?s=are-you-a-religious-person-poll-results-from-65-countries
Britain came 59th out of 65 nations in terms of the proportion of the population self-rating as a religious person, with just 30%, under half the global mean (63%) and well behind Thailand at the head of the index (94%). The six countries less religious than Britain were Hong Kong, The Netherlands, Czech Republic, Sweden, Japan, and China. Two-thirds of Britons either described themselves as not a religious person (53%) or a convinced atheist (13%), with 4% undecided. The results for selected countries, arranged by region, are shown below.
% across |
Religious person |
Not religious person |
Convinced atheist |
Global mean |
63 |
22 |
11 |
Europe |
|
|
|
Austria |
39 |
44 |
10 |
Belgium |
44 |
30 |
18 |
Czech Republic |
23 |
45 |
30 |
Denmark |
42 |
40 |
12 |
Finland |
56 |
32 |
10 |
France |
40 |
35 |
18 |
Germany |
34 |
42 |
17 |
Great Britain |
30 |
53 |
13 |
Greece |
71 |
15 |
6 |
Ireland |
45 |
41 |
10 |
Italy |
74 |
18 |
6 |
Netherlands |
26 |
51 |
15 |
Poland |
86 |
10 |
2 |
Portugal |
60 |
28 |
9 |
Russia |
70 |
18 |
5 |
Spain |
37 |
35 |
20 |
Sweden |
19 |
59 |
17 |
Switzerland |
38 |
46 |
12 |
North America |
|
|
|
Canada |
40 |
41 |
12 |
USA |
56 |
33 |
6 |
Asia |
|
|
|
China |
7 |
29 |
61 |
India |
76 |
21 |
2 |
Japan |
13 |
31 |
31 |
Korea |
44 |
49 |
6 |
Pakistan |
88 |
10 |
1 |
The number of Britons self-rating as religious seems first to have been measured (by Opinion Research Centre) in January-February 1968, when it stood at 58%. It was 36% when recorded by YouGov earlier this month. The question has been asked many times in between, albeit with variant wording, leading to some volatility in results. However, there has been a clear pattern of decline in religiosity since the 1990s, with, during the first half of the present decade, between 55% and 75% viewing themselves as irreligious. This is a much higher proportion of adults than professed no religion in the 2011 census of Britain (25%) or in the 2012 Integrated Household Survey (30%) or who doubted or denied the existence of God or a higher power in two YouGov polls of 2013 (35%).
Personal well-being
Christians tend to experience the highest levels of personal well-being in the UK and Muslims and religious ‘nones’ the lowest. This is suggested by an analysis of aggregated data for adults aged 16 and over from the Annual Population Survey for April 2011-March 2014 which was published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) on 27 March 2015 as How Does Personal Well-Being Vary by Sex, Disability, Ethnicity, and Religion? Respondents were asked to assess, on a scale running from 0 to 10, overall ‘how satisfied are you with your life nowadays?’; ‘to what extent do you feel that the things you do in your life are worthwhile?’; ‘how happy did you feel yesterday?’; and ‘how anxious did you feel yesterday?’ Means for each of these four measures are tabulated below, while the report, with links to data tables, can be read at:
http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_400162.pdf
Mean scores out of 10 |
Life satisfaction |
Life worthwhile |
Happiness yesterday |
Anxiety yesterday |
All adults |
7.46 |
7.70 |
7.33 |
3.03 |
No religion |
7.34 |
7.51 |
7.15 |
2.98 |
Christian |
7.54 |
7.81 |
7.43 |
3.01 |
Buddhist |
7.31 |
7.57 |
7.39 |
3.23 |
Hindu |
7.48 |
7.66 |
7.46 |
3.26 |
Jewish |
7.44 |
7.81 |
7.31 |
3.29 |
Muslim |
7.27 |
7.52 |
7.20 |
3.28 |
Sikh |
7.39 |
7.67 |
7.32 |
3.23 |
Other |
7.25 |
7.62 |
7.25 |
3.27 |
ONS does not attempt to explore the root cause of these religious differences in any detail, except to note that variations between and within equality groups generally can be attributed to various factors, including socio-economic characteristics and self-reported state of health. The relatively older age profile of Christians and younger profile of Muslims and ‘nones’ is likely to account for some of the difference, as is the relative deprivation of Muslims.
Muslims and non-Muslims
In our last post, on 12 April 2015, we reported on a telephone survey of Muslim opinion conducted by Survation for Sky News, noting that a parallel online poll of 1,001 non-Muslim Britons aged 18 and over had also been conducted for comparative purposes, the data tables for which were not then available. The tables for the latter study have now been released and can be found, together with the Muslim data, via links in a blog at:
http://survation.com/british-muslims-is-the-divide-increasing/
A comparison of Muslim and non-Muslim views is shown below, revealing a gulf on all issues, and very wide on some. This exemplified that 44% of non-Muslims admitted to being more suspicious of Muslims than they had been a few years back, rising to 49% of men and over-55s.
% down |
Muslims |
Non-Muslims |
Values of Islam |
|
|
Compatible with British values |
71 |
22 |
Incompatible with British values |
16 |
52 |
British Muslims doing enough to integrate |
|
|
Agree |
64 |
18 |
Disagree |
21 |
57 |
Muslims should condemn terrorism carried out in name of Islam |
|
|
Agree |
51 |
67 |
Disagree |
40 |
17 |
Sympathy with UK Muslims fighting in Syria |
|
|
A lot/some |
28 |
14 |
None |
61 |
77 |
Police/MI5 contributing to radicalization of young Muslims |
|
|
Agree |
39 |
16 |
Disagree |
29 |
50 |
Further recent exploration of anti-Muslim sentiment is contained in Ingrid Storm’s post on the Democratic Audit UK blog on 17 April 2015. Using data from the 2013 British Social Attitudes Survey, she shows that Muslims continue to be less accepted than other religious or ethnic minorities in Britain. She suggests that ‘negative media portrayals of Muslims and associations with Islamist terrorism amplify prejudice against this group among all parts of the population.’ See:
http://www.democraticaudit.com/?p=12510
Anglican church growth
Revd Dr Mark Hart, Rector of Plemstall and Guilden Sutton in the Diocese of Chester, has just (13 April 2015) published ‘From Delusion to Reality: An Evaluation of From Anecdote to Evidence’, the Church of England’s influential report (January 2014) on its church growth research programme (2011-13) which is now being used to drive ‘Reform and Renewal’ in the Church. A mathematician and engineer by background, Hart carefully reviews From Anecdote to Evidence in the light of the original research by Professor David Voas and Laura Watts of the University of Essex. Hart concludes that ‘From Anecdote to Evidence systematically misrepresents or misinterprets the underlying report by David Voas and Laura Watts, thereby exaggerating the usefulness of the findings for numerical growth’.
More specifically, Hart highlights eight major weaknesses in From Anecdote to Evidence, the first being its over-dependence upon self-reported assessments of growth, which are inflated and biased, rather than using statistical data from parish returns. On the basis of his critique, he calls into question both the From Evidence to Action initiative designed to encourage parishes to implement the findings presented in From Anecdote to Evidence, as well as the decision to borrow at least £100 million from the future, using Church Commissioners’ funds, in order to advance the ‘Reform and Renewal’ agenda for the Church, doubting that this will give an adequate return on investment either in terms of finance or church growth. Hart’s 18-page paper is extensively covered in the Church Times for 17 April 2015 (main report on p. 5, leader comment on p. 12) and can be downloaded in full from:
http://revmarkhart.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/from-delusion-to-reality.html
Upcoming events
The Church of England’s annual ‘Faith in Research’ conference is to be held at Novotel, Birmingham on 14 May 2015. The theme this year is ‘Everyone Counts’, the title of a congregational survey carried out in a sample of Anglican parishes in 2014, and about whose results Sarah Barter-Godfrey will be talking. Other plenary speakers include Professor Leslie Francis on psychological type and the Church of England, and Tom Sefton and Bethany Eckley on church-based social action. There are also parallel sessions on ministry, mission, occasional offices, and church growth. More details at:
‘Rethinking Modern British Studies’ is an international conference hosted by the University of Birmingham on 1-3 July 2015. Its extensive programme includes several panel sessions on religious themes, including one on the last day on ‘Public Opinion, Polling and Cultural and Religious Change in Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Britain’, with papers by Marcus Collins (on measuring permissiveness), Clive Field (on indicators of religiosity), and Ben Clements (on the religious beliefs and social attitudes of Catholics). More details at:
https://mbsbham.wordpress.com/programme-rethinking-modern-british-studies/
Professor Linda Woodhead is running a residential course on ‘Britain’s Religious Crisis’ at Gladstone’s Library, Hawarden on 3-5 July 2015. Drawing on her own empirical research, she intends to: highlight the growing values gap between religion and society; chart the rapid rise of religious ‘nones’ and the ‘seculigious’; review the battles for the soul of traditional religion and the role of politics and the media; and suggest how to resolve the crisis and move forward. More details at:
https://www.gladstoneslibrary.org/events/events-courses-list/britains-religious-crisis